A creationist epicly ends an argument on evolution.
Nonrandom survival? You are saying that variables that are randomly generated survive? As cells? As frogs? survive as what? Order does not just come out of thin air apart from any external force. So what is it that non-randomly survives? If we are talking about random mutations then survival IS by chance. Otherwise, they cannot be “random” mutations.
Tim Cooley says:
“Nonrandom survival? You are saying that variables that are randomly generated survive? … If we are talking about random mutations then survival IS by chance. Otherwise, they cannot be “random” mutations.”
You are absolutely clueless, aren’t you? You need to go away and study the theory of evolution all over again, preferably from a non-creationist website or from a science textbook. This article was written out of ignorance and it attacks a strawman of a perfectly sound scientific theory.
this conversation is over. All you can say is its mythology and Im clueless.
YOU HAVE NO ARGUMENTS. I’m going to spend time fighting the communism that is trying to take over my country. I’m not going to waste any more electricity.
The best advice I can give to you is to stop trusting your feeling SO MUCH. My country did and LOOK WHO WE ELECTED.
Let me tell you why atheism offends me. abortion, nontraditional marriage, sexual leudness, putting reason ahead of common decency ect ect. YOUR atheist Bible offends me. Please, it is people like you that elect democrats. nough said.
* * *